![]() ![]() |
Identity Politics
Before we can address the nature of a noncommercial, civic identity at a regional scale, however, we have to come to terms with the character of that identities. In a diverse metropolitan area, there are questions of minority versus majority identity and of how they might both be represented. This issue of the balance between the moral clarity of majority rule and the respect for the individual that protects minority interests is complex enough in the law, but in the realm of culture, art, politics, and civic identity, finding answers will be very difficult indeed. Today there is one center of the traditional city, and its remaining civic language—the monocultural language of the melting pot —is often seen as not meaningful or relevant to the bulk of urban residents. If one lives in the suburbs, there is virtually no civic presence at all. If the lack of accessible civic identity is contributing to our sense of fragmentation, we must find a way to build a more inclusive civic identity, one that balances the center with the margins. Ring City seeks to make over large parts of our cities and suburbs
by redirecting exurban investment back toward the urban center. The identity
of this new realm But this proposal isn't only about movement, politics, scale, or identity
by themselves; it is about their relationship to the idea of fragmentation,
and how urban design, transportation planning, and political ideas might
be coordinated to resist that fragmentation and reconnect parts of our
society that have become disengaged from one another. The relationship
of spatial hierarchy to social order underscores the important role of
centralized planning strategies throughout history. The mechanics of the
Ring City idea, then, are found in some of the basic principles of urban
design. |